Fechar

%0 Journal Article
%4 sid.inpe.br/mtc-m21d/2023/02.09.12.44
%2 sid.inpe.br/mtc-m21d/2023/02.09.12.44.58
%@doi 10.14295/derb.v43.774
%T Avaliação das simulações de temperatura e precipitação de um subconjunto de modelos do CMIP6 para o Brasil
%D 2022
%9 journal article
%A Correa, Wesley de Souza Campos,
%A Soares, Wagner Rodrigues,
%A Rosales Aylas, Georgynio Yossimar,
%A Reis Júnior, Neyval Costa,
%A Marengo, José Antonio,
%A Chou, Sin Chan,
%A Nobre, Carlos Afonso,
%@affiliation Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES)
%@affiliation Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES)
%@affiliation Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES)
%@affiliation Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES)
%@affiliation Centro Nacional de Monitoramento e Alertas de Desastres Naturais (CEMADEN)
%@affiliation Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)
%@affiliation Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
%@electronicmailaddress wesley.campos.correa@gmail.com
%@electronicmailaddress admcirrus@gmail.com
%@electronicmailaddress ragy3008@gmail.com
%@electronicmailaddress neyval@gmail.com
%@electronicmailaddress jose.marengo@cemaden.gov.br
%@electronicmailaddress chou.sinchan@gmail.com
%@electronicmailaddress cnobre.res@gmail.com
%B Derbyana
%V 43
%P e774
%K Climate change, Global Climate Model, IPCC, Modeling.
%X This article examines the ability of 40 CMIP6 climate models to simulate the mean temperature and mean precipitation observed in each state in Brazil from January 1985 to December 2014. Despite the simulation biases, the CMIP6 was able to simulate the annual and seasonal behavior and capture the trend of the analyzed variables. For surface temperature, the subset of the CMIP6 showed the best performance for the South and Southeast Brazil regions, highlighted in Paraná, Santa Catarina, and São Paulo states. Midwest Region has the best performance for precipitation. In relation to temperature trends over the 30-year study period, 19852014, all states in Brazil showed an increasing trend, both for the subset of the CMIP6 and observed data. However, precipitation in the North and Southeast regions did not show a clear trend for the analyzed period, since some states showed an increase whereas some showed a reduction. However, the states in the Central-West and Northeast regions show a trend toward a reduced precipitation. On the other hand, in the South Region, all states have increasing precipitation, as supported by observed and simulated data. Even with the inherent uncertainties in climate modeling and detected biases, this study is relevant to show the behavior of the present models nowadays climate simulations. The evaluation presented in this work established confidence levels to use the subset CMIP6 model in future climate studies, as detailed in this paper.
%@language pt
%3 774-Texto do Artigo-688-1113-10-20221227.pdf


Fechar